Now I'm not sure if it is just me but after working on recreating a magazine as part of my course (I chose Source) I noticed something. Of all the ones I read as research they seemed to come in two hugely varing styles. Half are the tech and jargon heavy mags such as Digital Photographer and the rest are overly pretencious tosh, such as source. Is there no middle ground?
I would love a Magazine that has beautiful pictures with a little context rather than stunning images with non or boring ones with loads. Surely others must agree?
Rant over
No comments:
Post a Comment